The International Spectator, Vol. 44, No. 3, September 2009
30/09/2009
Special core on The Caucasus at the Crossroads
Is the EU up to the Requirements of Peace in the Middle East? Free
Recent Publications Free
-
Issue
44/3
Opinions
Where is Israel Heading?
Mark A. Heller
Neither the military operation in Gaza nor the elections that
brought a right-wing government to power has fundamentally changed
Israel's foreign policy agenda. What has changed is the apparent
determination of the new US administration under Barack Obama to
improve America's standing in the Muslim and Arab worlds. Given
the centrality of good relations with the United States to Israeli
security, Israel's most salient problem now is to avoid a serious
clash with the United States as both countries, in their own - and
different - ways, deal with the Palestinian and Iranian issues.
Israel will have to walk a narrow tightrope until the end of 2009,
doing things on the Palestinian front that it would prefer not to
do and refraining from doing things with respect to Iran that it
would rather do. However, its margin of maneuver is likely to
broaden after that if Obama concludes that neither the
Israeli-Palestinian peace process nor engagement with Iran is
providing much return on his investment of time, effort and
political capital.
Buy this article online
Fatah-Hamas Rivalries after Gaza: Is Unity Impossible?
Benoit Challand
Even if Israeli Operation Cast Lead seemed at first to have driven
a decisive wedge in the prospect of resumed unity between Fatah
and Hamas because of President Abbas' mild condemnation of the
Israeli operation in December 2008, both main Palestinian
political factions decided to launch a process of reconciliation
under the aegis of the Egyptian government last February . Five
months after the two sides' commitment to unity talks, a final
deal still has to be signed. The two main stumbling blocks on the
road of unity remain a formal agreement in terms of institutional
power sharing and the question of resources linked to security
management in the Territories.
Buy this article online
Is the EU up to the Requirements of Peace in the Middle East?
Muriel Asseburg and Volker Perthes
The outlook for conflict settlement in the Middle East is gloomy,
and the chances for a new round of peace talks being initiated by
the parties in the region are next to zero. US President Barack
Obama has announced that he wants to engage
"aggressively" in favour of Middle East peace making and
has taken first encouraging steps in that direction. It would,
however, be wrong to assume that the US President can achieve
conflict settlement largely on his own. Europeans should therefore
rethink their policy approaches - above all, how to deal with
Hamas, the Gaza Strip and how to push the peace process forward -
and seek a more effective division of labour and coordination with
the Obama administration.
View this article online
Essays
The Caucasus at the Crossroads
After the 2008 Russia-Georgia War: Implications for the Wider Caucasus
Nona Mikhelidze
The Georgian-Russian war in August 2008 and Russia's ensuing
recognition of South Ossetia's and Abkhazia's independence have
generated a new context in relations between the EU, the US and
Russia. The crisis created new sources of instability in the
entire post-Soviet space, highlighting a new form of Russian
revisionism and revealing the limitations of Western policies in
what the Kremlin views as its sphere of influence.
Caucasian-Central Asian states now wonder whether it is worth
complicating their relations with Moscow for the sake of limited
or uncertain support from the West. Even if the long-term
repercussions of the Russian-Georgian crisis remains
unpredictable, one thing is clear: the EU and the US should engage
with the region more intensively. In the long run, only economic
development in the region, genuine democratisation and real
prospects of becoming anchored in Euro-Atlantic structures,
alongside effective confidence-building measures between the
parties, will be able to induce the secessionist regions to
rethink their future.
Buy this article online
EU Policies and Sub-Regional Multilateralism in the Caspian Region
Leila Alieva
The EU's agenda in promoting multilateralism faces a few
challenges in the eastward direction. The Caspian Sea basin, which
has been acquiring increasing importance for the EU in the context
of energy, above all gas, supplies from the Caucasus and Central
Asia, represents a complex mix of states with different histories,
identities, regimes, centeres of gravity and regional ambitions.
Unlike the Black Sea basin, where the EU has developed the Black
Sea Synergy policy, none of the Caspian littoral states is an EU
member and this has led to a lack of EU interest in and commitment
to the promotion of multilateralism in the area. Thus, in spite of
significant energy security interests, the EU lacks the will, the
capacity or the consistency to address regional security issues or
promote reform. Indeed, economic interests are inevitably likely
to clash with the reform promotion objective.
Buy this article online
***
The Myth of a Sino-Russian Challenge to the West
Hiski Haukkala and Linda Jakobson
In recent years, there has been a lively debate on "the end
of the West" with the rise of authoritarian capitalist powers
and the challenge they pose to the values and institutions of the
West. The debate has to be qualified in two important respects.
First, China and Russia have - albeit for different reasons -
major stakes in the preservation of the current world order, thus
making it unlikely that they will be able or willing to launch a
sustained assault on it. Second, and perhaps more importantly,
despite certain current similarities in their international
outlook, China and Russia are in fact far from natural and
permanent partners in the creation of a new anti-liberal world
order. Therefore the future challenge for the West is to find ways
to deal constructively with these countries so as to reinforce the
liberal and multilateral elements of the present world order
rather than undo it. Instead of galvanising a strong resistance
against the rise of China, and to a lesser extent Russia, the West
should seek to tie the new powers more closely into the existing
world order. This will necessarily require a moderate and
constructive stance from China and Russia, one that can plausibly
be expected in the natural course of events, provided they are
given a chance to voice their legitimate concerns.
Buy this article online
Can Further Nationalisation Facilitate a Common EU Approach to Migration?
Steffen Angenendt and Roderick Parkes
The European Council's 2008 'Immigration Pact' has been touted by
its main protagonist, the French government, as a turning point in
EU migration policymaking. In one respect at least, the French are
not exaggerating. The Pact represents a challenge to a key
assumption underpinning European integration, namely that
communitarised policymaking procedures are the best means of
achieving truly common policies: Paris presented the
intergovernmental Pact as a means of succeeding where
communitarised decision-making has failed - in achieving the goal
of a coherent common migration policy. However, analysis shows the
French claims to be largely unfounded: although the European
Council might theoretically have played a useful role here, in
practice its efforts will add little to the achievement of a truly
common policy.
Buy this article online
Italy in World Affairs
Italy in the European Union, between Prodi and Berlusconi
Maurizio Carbone
Since it came back into power in May 2008, the Berlusconi
government has undertaken a number of important initiatives in
foreign policy, especially in relation to the European Union.
Three cases concern the ratification of the Lisbon Treaty, the war
in Georgia and the climate change/energy package. Rather than
following a pro- or anti-Europe line, it is argued that the link
between all these initiatives is the development of a pragmatic
foreign policy, in which the ultimate aim is to promote Italy's
economic interests. This means that in some cases the Berlusconi
government is supportive of the European integration process,
especially when no specific Italian interest is at stake, whereas
it does not hesitate to undermine it should it clash with Italy's
economic interests.
Buy this article online
Book Reviews
More Black Holes and White Walls
Rocco Bellanova
Review of:
Playing the identity card : surveillance, security and
identification in global perspective, edited by Colin J. Bennett
and David Lyon, Routledge, 2008
Buy this article online
Climate Change as Seen Through a Political Theory Lens
Ganna Onysko
Review of:
Political theory and global climate change, edited by Steve
Vanderheiden, MIT Press, c2008
Buy this article online
Playing by Paying: International Aid to Palestine
Nathalie Tocci
Review of:
International assistance to the Palestinians after Oslo :
political guilt, wasted money, Anne Le More, Routledge, 2008
Buy this article online
The Dynamics of Democratic Consolidation: Explaining Turkey's Failures through Italy and Spain's Progress
Donatella Cugliandro
Review of:
Constructing democracy in Southern Europe : a comparative analysis
of Italy, Spain and Turkey, Lauren M. McLaren, Routledge, 2008
Buy this article online
Recent Publications
View this article online
go to Routledge
